Annex 1

STATEMENT ON THE OCCASION OF THE

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE
ASSOCIATION OF HYDRO-METEOROLOGICAL EQUIPMENT INDUSTRY

by

Mr Dieter C. Schiessl, Director, WWW

World Meteorological Organization

(Bucharest, Romania, 4 May 2005)

Mr Ben Dieterink, Chairman of the of the Association of Hydro-Meteorological Equipment Industry,

Mr Jan Hörhammer, Vice-chairman of the of the Association of Hydro-Meteorological Equipment Industry,

Distinguished Members of the Association,

Ladies and Gentlemen,

 

              It is an honour and a privilege for me to convey the message of the Secretary-General of the World Meteorological Organization, Mr M. Jarraud, to the General Assembly of the Association of Hydro-Meteorological Equipment Industry (HMEI).

 

Ladies and Gentlemen,

 

            It has always been part of the WMO strategy to develop and sustain a proactive collaboration with instrument and equipment manufacturers since we both work for a common goal, namely the enhancement of global meteorological, environmental and hydrological observation and monitoring capacities, which should provide the database for studying and understanding of the global processes related to weather, climate and water.  I am very pleased that the HMEI was able to quickly fill the void that had been existing for a long time between WMO and instrument manufacturers.  I am also pleased to see that, for the first time, the HMEI is officially represented at METEOREX and TECO-2005.  The HMEI, with its 76 current members that represents already a large part of the manufacturing industry, serves as the single contact point for WMO in aspects related to instruments, equipment and services vice versa, the HMEI represents today the instrument industry in several WMO bodies.  The official seat of the HMEI Executive Secretary in the WMO Secretariat is crucial for the close cooperation of the Association with the WMO Secretariat.

 

              You most certainly recall, that following the request of the HMEI Association, the fifty-fourth session of the WMO’s Executive Council (2002) granted HMEI a consultative status with WMO.  Based on this consultative status, the HMEI Association is entitled to be represented by an observer, without voting rights, at sessions of the World Meteorological Organization Congress, regional associations and the technical commissions in which HMEI is interested. At these sessions, HMEI is entitled to present documents, propose items for agenda and take part in the discussions.

 

              To date, the HMEI nominated 31 experts from 13 firms as to work with the nine CIMO Expert Teams.  So far, nine HMEI representatives had participated in the Joint Meeting of the Expert Team on Upper-Air Systems Intercomparisons and International Organizing Committee on Upper-Air Systems Intercomparisons, held in Geneva, Switzerland in March 2004, three representatives participated in the Expert Team on Surface Technology and Measurement Techniques, held in Geneva, Switzerland in October 2004, and three representatives participated in the Expert Team on Remote Sensing Upper-Air technology and Techniques, held in Geneva, Switzerland in March 2005.

 

              I understand, HMEI is prepared to nominate experts to other WMO Commissions’ expert teams, including the Commissions for Basic Systems, Climatology, Agrometeorology, Aeronautical Meteorology and Hydrology.  This will undoubtly bring benefits to both WMO and HMEI.

 

              The HMEI representatives also participated in the session of the WMO constituent bodies, such as Fifty-sixth session of the Executive Council, Twelfth Session of the Commission for Hydrology, and the Thirteenth Session of the Commission for Basic Systems.

 

              It is very gratifying to note that the joint efforts of HMEI and the WMO Secretariat have opened a new dimension for collaboration between the private instrument sector and WMO. 

 

Ladies and Gentlemen,

 

              WMO Intercomparisons are essential both for WMO Programmes as well as for manufacturers and for the users who  demand accurate and homogenous measurements. Comparisons of sensors, instruments and equipment, which are in operational use, are important means of determining the performance characteristics of the systems under in-situ (field) conditions.

 

              In this regard I am pleased that many of manufacturers were able to take part in the WMO intercomparisons organized in 2005.  This includes the WMO Laboratory Intercomparisons of Rainfall Intensity (RI) gauges, WMO Intercomparison of High-quality Radiosonde Systems and International and Regional Pyrheliometer Comparisons.

 

              The WMO Laboratory Intercomparison of Rainfall Intensity Gauges was launched, simultaneously, in September 2004, in the laboratories of the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, Météo‑France and the Italian Met Service (University of Genoa). The selected 19 pairs of instruments from 18 manufacturers were divided into three groups, with each group being tested for a period of about three months in each of the laboratories, in order to obtain a high degree of confidence in the results. The first phase of tests was completed in January and the second in April 2005, the last - third phase is expected to end in mid-2005.  The preliminary results of the first phase will be presented during TECO-2005.

 

            The WMO Intercomparison of High Quality Radiosonde Systems was held in Vacoas, Mauritius, from 1 to 27 February 2005.  After training of the local supporting staff and the installation of the ground equipment, the intercomparison started on 7 February 2005.  Six operational radiosonde systems participated in the intercomparison, which comprised 62 successful comparison flights.  The objectives of the intercomparison were achieved and the preliminary results will be provided to TECO-2005 participants.

 

              Preparations have started for the tenth International Pyrheliometer Comparison (IPC‑X) and conjoint Regional Pyrheliometer Comparisons (RPC) to be held in September/October 2005 in the World Radiation Centre (WRC), Davos, Switzerland.  That event is primarily intended for the calibration of standard pyrheliometers of all WMO Regional Radiation Centres (RRCs). It is planned to carry out conjointly RPCs of all Regions similarly as at previous IPCs. National Standard Pyrheliometers that are maintained at National Radiation Centres (NRCs) concerned, will be compared against the World Standard Group as part of the RPC. If the comparison infrastructure allows, other national institutions may apply for participation at the IPC‑X. The WRC in Davos, will organize a scientific symposium and a workshop during the IPC‑X related to meteorological radiometry and atmospheric radiation and relevant manufacturers are invited to take part also in this symposium.

 

Ladies and Gentlemen,

 

                   The Product catalogue of the HMEI members provides direct links to on-line information of HMEI member companies' products.  At the same time, most of your members advertise their products also in the World Meteorological Instrument Catalogue.  Its third edition (2005) is being prepared by China Meteorological Administration (CMA) on behalf of WMO.  I would suggest that, in the future we might join our efforts and produce only one catalogue to assist our WMO’s Members in selecting the most suitable instruments for applications.  For this to happen, the outline and format of a possible ”common” Catalogue should have the structure agreed at CIMO-XIII (2002).

 

Ladies and Gentlemen,

 

              WMO is at the forefront in developing and setting standards and defining methods of observations in all these application areas.  I truly believe that the continuing co-operation between WMO and the HMEI Association will be beneficial for both communities.  You will learn early of WMO plans and intentions, and WMO will benefit from views and advice the industry has to offer. It is very important, for instance, that WMO experts are made aware of potential engineering or cost implications newly emerging observing methodology might have on the instrumentation and on the operational and economic possibilities of the developing countries.  It is also helpful for the manufacturers to receive periodically reports on the reliability and maintainability of their products that re deployed on developing countries or operated under harsh environmental conditions.

               In conclusion, I would like once again to congratulate the HMEI and assure you of WMO's continuous collaboration.  I wish you a successful continuation of your deliberations here in Bucharest.

                          Thank you for your attention.

_________________________________________