Report - HMEI experts at Management Committee
for the CHy Project on
the Assessment of the Performance of Flow Measurement Instruments &
Techniques,
Geneva, Switzerland, 18-19 November, 2009
Following an invitation from WMO, HMEI sent expert
member representatives to this meeting.
Dr Skripalle from SEBA attended as the HMEI
expert representative. Mr R. Haimelin from Vaisala also
attended as an expert,
HMEI thanks Mr Haimelin for the the following
report.
MEETING REPORT by Mr. R. Haimelin
Background
The Management Committee (MC) for the CHy Project on the Assessment of
the Performance of Flow Measurements and Techniques was established in
2007. The aim for the committee is to unify the determination of
uncertainty in discharge measurement. As the uncertainty includes
instrument precision, industry representatives (HMEI) were invited into
this first meeting in order to for the committee to hear industry's
opinion and on the other hand give a message to hydrological equipment
manufacturers to work on unifying how instrument accuracy is expressed.
There is now a Flow Measurement Techniques website at:
http://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/hwrp/FlowMeasurement.html.
Notes
The meeting first summarized what has been done during the past two
years.
- A survey to National Hydrological Services by J.
Fulford and S. Busaz has been conducted to find out what kind of
equipment and from which manufacturer is used in the country to
measure discharge. COMMENT: Only 14% of WMO members responded,
mainly from western countries. According to the survey, mechanical
instruments are used for over 70% of flow measurements.
- A paper on General Uncertainty Management (GUM) method
by J. Fulford.
- An example of GUM in flow measurement by M. Muste
- Discussion papers on instrument specifications by
P, J. McCurry
It was suggested that the GUM method should be recommended by WMO in
estimating uncertainty. Until now there hasn't been one general and
widely accepted method in estimating uncertainty. It was the idea of
Climate and Water Department of the WMO to investigate and finally
propose one general method and terminology. The GUM method is widely
used and suitable for almost all uncertainty estimations. The basic
principle is that it takes into account all sources of uncertainty, for
example such as the experience level of the person conducting a
measurement. The division of uncertainty sources differs from
traditional way where sources of error are either random or systematic,
so that now the error is defined either by statistical analysis (Type A)
or other means (Type B).
The ISO representative pointed out that this method is widely used in
their standards and recommended its use. There was a general
understanding among the meeting participants that GUM is the way to
proceed with estimating uncertainty.
It was proposed that WMO should recommended national hydrological
services to let the manufacturers conduct the testing of their equipment
in each country in an independent testing company to meet the individual
national requirements. An estimation was given that such a test would
cost something around 10 000 USD. Another proposal was that the industry
should express the uncertainty of devices in a transparent and traceable
way so that the declared accuracy of any device could be used as such in
the uncertainty assessment procedure.
The vision of the CHy/WMO is to expand the uncertainty assessment
procedure (GUM) to be recommended by all the WMO branches and eventually
include the uncertainty assessment in modelling. Members of other
branches were invited to take part in the meeting to hear about the GUM
method and its applicability in all uncertainty assessment.
Representatives from Climatology, and Argrology were present at the
meeting.
It was agreed that the committee will try to produce a PC-software which
can be used to estimate uncertainty in flow measurement. The idea is to
provide an easy user interface so that everyone with basic computer
skills could use it. The software could be then used either for
comparing different measurement techniques and finding the most suitable
for one's needs before purchasing the equipment, or for estimating the
uncertainty for equipment already in use.
The message from the Management Committee towards industry was that the
manufacturers should work through HMEI in establishing a common and
general way how the uncertainty of equipment is expressed, so that one
can easily compare for example sensor accuracy from different
manufacturers. It was suggested by J. Fulford that the accuracy would be
for example expressed in the measured units over the full declared
operational range of the equipment with 95% confidence determined with a
relevant distribution.
The meeting concentrated mostly on the second day in how to proceed from
here. A working website is established and progress can be followed
there.
Meeting Participants
Ms Zsuszsanna Buzás
Ministry of Environment and Water, Hungary
Ms Janice Fulford
Testing Section Chief, Hydrologic Instrumentation Facility, U.S.
Geological Survey, USA
Mr P. J. McCurry
National Manager, Hydrometric Operations, Hydrometric Monitoring
Division, Water Survey of Canada, Environment Canada, Canada
Dr Marian Muste
Research Engineer, IIHR - Hydroscience & Engineering, The University of
Iowa, USA
Dr Paul J. Pilon
Engineering Advisor, International Joint Commission, Canada
Ms Jenny Pellaux
Technical Programme Manager & Technical Editor, ISO Central Secretariat,
Switzerland
Dr Jürgen Skripalle (Representing HMEI)
Chief, Flow Division, SEBA Hydrometrie GmbH, Germany
Mr Bruce Summer
Executive Secretary, Association of HMEI, Switzerland
Prof. Gordon Young
President, IAHS, Canada
Mr Claudio Caponi
Chief, Capacity Building in Hydrology and Water Resources Office
Climate and Water Department, Switzerland
Mr. Risto Haimelin (Representing HMEI)
Application Specialist, Meteorology, Vaisalala OYJ, Finland
The
WMO Report of this meeting is available here.